26–11
Dataset · 37 games · 2,525 FGA|All teams · 290 games tracked
All teams · 290 games tracked
Better looks, cold finishing
Defense-led SQ
Edge comes from tightening opponent looks and volume more than generating elite offense — 1st in expected pts allowed per game (62.2), 9th of 15 in shot diet (1.01 expected pts per attempt). Opponents shoot about their usual rate per attempt against this team.
26–11 with 30/37 SQ wins — 2nd in avg SQ edge (+6.7) while finishing lags (-0.9, 10th of 15). They keep winning the look battle even when shots don't fall. 42% FG (15th of 15) looks low, but they live from three — 30.7 attempts and 10.6 makes per game (45% of FGA) — with 35% 3P% (7th of 15) — 35% of attempts from above-break threes.
- Worse looks
- 7–0 · +5.4 finishing · -3.6 edge
- Better looks
- 19–11 · -2.3 finishing · +9.1 edge
League rank · SQ wins 2nd of 15 · avg edge 2nd of 15 · making 10th of 15 · off xP/F 9th of 15 · def xP/g 1st of 15 · opp-adj 5th of 15 · FG 15th of 15 (ESPN) · 3PA/g 1st of 15 · 3PM/g 1st of 15
Won despite worse looks
Scoreboard wins where the opponent had better shot locations in our model.
+3 more in game log.
Lost despite better looks
Losses where this team got the cleaner offense but not enough makes.
+7 more in game log.
Season stats use 37 tracked team games (May 1–Aug 24, 2026) from 290 league-wide — not the complete WNBA schedule. Totals refresh as games finalize. SQ wins count games where this team got the better looks; they can differ from W–L.
Public ESPN shot data only — no defender distance or contested-shot tracking. Expected value uses location, player zone history, and shot clock, not how open the shooter was. Methodology
Season shot diet
Where Golden State shoots across the tracked season — share of attempts by zone and finishing within each area.
Home away defense
Opponent shot quality allowed when this team plays at home vs on the road — same tracked FGA model as season defense.
20 home / 17 away tracked. Schedule and travel can move these numbers — compare to full-season def rows above.
Defensive process
ESPN box-score process on tracked games — turnovers forced, second chances allowed, free throws conceded, plus steals and blocks. Complements FGA-only def rows above.
Opp TO rank 5th of 1537 tracked games with box scores. Complements FGA-only defense rows — not part of SQ wins or opponent-adjusted shot quality.
Full process edge
Full process edge per game — expected points from shots and finishing plus free throws, turnover cost, and second-chance value. Positive means this team won the overall process battle more often than not.
+12.2 · rank 2nd of 1537 tracked games with box scores. Compare to SQ edge above — divergence means free throws, turnovers, or second chances carried the story.
Roster stats
Tap a player for the full zone profile.Season looks and finishing by player. Tap a row for the full zone profile.
Kaitlyn Chen 99/188 FG | 36 | 188 | 30% good | 0.99 | +31.2 |
Veronica Burton 150/348 FG | 37 | 348 | 21% good | 0.97 | +15.4 |
Janelle Salaun 151/356 FG | 36 | 356 | 26% good | 1.05 | +14.7 |
Cecilia Zandalasini 104/264 FG | 33 | 264 | 11% good | 0.93 | +6.1 |
Nadia Fingall 2/2 FG | 2 | 2 | 50% good | 1.10 | +2.8 |
Ashten Prechtel 2/5 FG | 2 | 5 | 60% good | 1.17 | -0.9 |
Ndjakalenga Mwenentanda 0/1 FG | 1 | 1 | 100% good | 1.31 | -1.3 |
Tiffany Hayes 99/219 FG | 33 | 219 | 37% good | 1.00 | -1.6 |
Player 4398577 0/3 FG | 3 | 3 | 67% good | 1.26 | -3.8 |
Juste Jocyte 8/26 FG | 8 | 26 | 12% good | 0.97 | -4.1 |
Laeticia Amihere 39/84 FG | 24 | 84 | 60% good | 1.04 | -4.3 |
Gabby Williams 181/445 FG | 35 | 445 | 21% good | 0.96 | -7.4 |
Kiah Stokes 53/123 FG | 36 | 123 | 55% good | 1.12 | -14.2 |
Kaila Charles 80/199 FG | 37 | 199 | 38% good | 1.03 | -21.2 |
Kayla Thornton 95/262 FG | 37 | 262 | 39% good | 1.11 | -43.6 |
Game log
| Date | Opponent | Result | Shot selection | Shot making |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24 | W80–66 | +11.1 | +0.5 | |
| Aug 21 | L70–73 | +4.7 | -13.8 | |
| Aug 19 | L66–77 | +22.7 | -18.5 | |
| Aug 17 | W78–70 | +13.2 | -2.4 | |
| Aug 12 | W91–71 | -0.2 | +10.9 | |
| Aug 9 | W84–78 | +2.7 | +6.0 | |
| Aug 7 | W94–76 | +10.9 | +3.1 | |
| Aug 4 | vs TOR | W92–81 | +6.9 | +4.0 |
| Aug 2 | vs TOR | W96–79 | -3.1 | +14.2 |
| Jul 29 | L89–91 | +26.6 | -3.7 | |
| Jul 20 | L82–90 | +11.2 | -1.0 | |
| Jul 18 | W74–69 | +1.5 | +2.4 | |
| Jul 15 | W88–75 | -8.4 | +8.0 | |
| Jul 10 | W79–64 | +1.1 | +10.3 | |
| Jul 8 | @ TOR | W83–75 | +2.5 | +3.2 |
| Jul 6 | W62–49 | +10.2 | -16.0 | |
| Jul 4 | W88–83 | +1.4 | +3.2 | |
| Jun 28 | W76–67 | +11.4 | -0.5 | |
| Jun 26 | W78–75 | -3.2 | -5.1 | |
| Jun 24 | W77–66 | -0.7 | +5.4 | |
| Jun 21 | L73–92 | +10.1 | -4.9 | |
| Jun 19 | L75–81 | +12.3 | -9.9 | |
| Jun 17 | W91–80 | +0.8 | +7.0 | |
| Jun 15 | W78–58 | +5.0 | +3.3 | |
| Jun 12 | W76–72 | +3.7 | -14.2 | |
| Jun 9 | W87–81 | -3.6 | +2.3 | |
| Jun 6 | L79–84 | +7.1 | -1.7 | |
| Jun 4 | L84–87 | +7.4 | -6.3 | |
| Jun 2 | W95–77 | +13.7 | +7.5 | |
| May 31 | L81–91 | +3.4 | -6.7 | |
| May 28 | W90–88 | -5.7 | +2.1 | |
| May 25 | W97–70 | +20.9 | +3.5 | |
| May 22 | L82–90 | +5.1 | -12.1 | |
| May 21 | W87–70 | +10.7 | -2.7 | |
| May 13 | L63–69 | +6.4 | -21.3 | |
| May 10 | W95–79 | +15.5 | +11.3 | |
| May 8 | W91–80 | +14.1 | +0.2 |















