11–34
Dataset · 45 games · 3,068 FGA|All teams · 357 games tracked
All teams · 357 games tracked
Scoreboard tracks the process
Offense-led SQ
Edge comes from shot creation more than defensive suppression — 2nd in expected pts per attempt (1.03) while opponent look quality ranks 15th of 15. Opponents finish +0.04 expected pts per shot above their season norm in this sample.
11–34 with 18/45 SQ wins — getting the better looks more often than the scoreboard (-3.1 avg edge, -2.0 finishing). 32% of attempts from above-break threes.
- Worse looks
- 6–21 · -0.5 finishing · -9.4 edge
- Better looks
- 5–13 · -4.2 finishing · +6.3 edge
League rank · SQ wins 12th of 15 · avg edge 13th of 15 · making 12th of 15 · off xP/F 2nd of 15 · def xP/g 15th of 15 · opp-adj 15th of 15 · FG 9th of 15 (ESPN) · 3PA/g 5th of 15 · 3PM/g 4th of 15
Won despite worse looks
Scoreboard wins where the opponent had better shot locations in our model.
+2 more in game log.
Lost despite better looks
Losses where this team got the cleaner offense but not enough makes.
+9 more in game log.
Season stats use 45 tracked team games (May 1–Oct 24, 2026) from 357 league-wide — not the complete WNBA schedule. Totals refresh as games finalize. SQ wins count games where this team got the better looks; they can differ from W–L.
Public ESPN shot data only — no defender distance or contested-shot tracking. Expected value uses location, player zone history, and shot clock, not how open the shooter was. Methodology
Season shot diet
Where Toronto shoots across the tracked season — share of attempts by zone and finishing within each area.
Home away defense
Opponent shot quality allowed when this team plays at home vs on the road — same tracked FGA model as season defense.
22 home / 23 away tracked. Schedule and travel can move these numbers — compare to full-season def rows above.
Defensive process
ESPN box-score process on tracked games — turnovers forced, second chances allowed, free throws conceded, plus steals and blocks. Complements FGA-only def rows above.
Opp TO rank 12th of 1545 tracked games with box scores. Complements FGA-only defense rows — not part of SQ wins or opponent-adjusted shot quality.
Full process edge
Full process edge per game — expected points from shots and finishing plus free throws, turnover cost, and second-chance value. Positive means this team won the overall process battle more often than not.
-11.4 · rank 15th of 1545 tracked games with box scores. Compare to SQ edge above — divergence means free throws, turnovers, or second chances carried the story.
Roster stats
Tap a player for the full zone profile.Season looks and finishing by player. Tap a row for the full zone profile.
 Marina Mabrey 218/494 FG | 32 | 494 | 23% good | 0.98 | +57.0 |
 Julie Allemand 77/144 FG | 34 | 144 | 30% good | 1.05 | +43.1 |
 Kiki Rice 132/278 FG | 29 | 278 | 40% good | 0.97 | +19.9 |
 Nyara Sabally 108/205 FG | 24 | 205 | 57% good | 1.10 | +11.2 |
 Player 4398589 5/8 FG | 1 | 8 | 38% good | 1.03 | +3.8 |
 Player 5364343 17/37 FG | 12 | 37 | 60% good | 1.11 | +0.1 |
 Nikolina Milic 9/19 FG | 6 | 19 | 42% good | 0.98 | -0.7 |
 Player 2491232 3/7 FG | 3 | 7 | 43% good | 0.97 | -0.8 |
 Player 3904479 2/5 FG | 1 | 5 | 60% good | 1.02 | -1.1 |
 Temi Fagbenle 61/125 FG | 25 | 125 | 62% good | 1.09 | -3.0 |
 Aneesah Morrow 23/54 FG | 7 | 54 | 41% good | 1.02 | -5.2 |
 Kiana Williams 6/22 FG | 3 | 22 | 23% good | 1.01 | -7.3 |
 Player 4398766 6/20 FG | 4 | 20 | 45% good | 1.15 | -8.0 |
 Tima Pouye 19/55 FG | 14 | 55 | 38% good | 1.04 | -11.2 |
 Laura Juskaite 174/376 FG | 45 | 376 | 51% good | 1.08 | -13.3 |
 Brittney Sykes 105/253 FG | 18 | 253 | 35% good | 0.97 | -18.4 |
 Teonni Key 35/95 FG | 30 | 95 | 67% good | 1.10 | -31.1 |
 Kia Nurse 71/212 FG | 43 | 212 | 26% good | 1.06 | -33.0 |
 Isabelle Harrison 147/346 FG | 32 | 346 | 42% good | 1.03 | -39.1 |
 Maria Conde 104/290 FG | 35 | 290 | 32% good | 1.05 | -44.0 |
Game log
| Date | Opponent | Result | Shot selection | Shot making |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24 |  @ CONN | L81–95 | +3.6 | -22.1 |
| Sep 22 |  @ CHI | L85–97 | -1.3 | -6.6 |
| Sep 20 |  vs NY | L69–106 | +1.0 | -17.6 |
| Sep 18 |  vs IND | L85–103 | +6.6 | -5.1 |
| Aug 29 |  @ PHX | L69–101 | -14.4 | -14.1 |
| Aug 28 |  @ LV | L73–93 | -6.6 | -3.8 |
| Aug 26 |  @ SEA | L78–90 | -7.0 | -18.6 |
| Aug 23 | vs LV | L78–88 | +3.8 | +2.7 |
| Aug 21 |  vs POR | W82–79 | -13.4 | -5.3 |
| Aug 19 |  @ WAS | L82–93 | -6.7 | +0.4 |
| Aug 18 | vs IND | L95–101 | +19.3 | -9.8 |
| Aug 12 |  @ DAL | L88–94 | +6.2 | -5.8 |
| Aug 10 |  @ ATL | L95–107 | -10.8 | +14.9 |
| Aug 6 | @ POR | L83–97 | +6.0 | -6.0 |
| Aug 4 |  @ GSV | L81–92 | -6.9 | +4.9 |
| Aug 2 | @ GSV | L79–96 | +3.1 | -3.9 |
| Jul 30 |  vs MIN | L72–104 | -22.8 | +0.8 |
| Jul 28 | @ MIN | L93–100 | +5.4 | +1.0 |
| Jul 20 | vs LV | L83–109 | -4.9 | -10.8 |
| Jul 17 | vs ATL | L92–111 | -18.9 | +10.8 |
| Jul 14 | vs WAS | L62–79 | -17.9 | -13.7 |
| Jul 12 | vs NY | W93–91 | -12.3 | +9.2 |
| Jul 10 | vs DAL | L95–108 | -8.8 | +19.3 |
| Jul 8 | vs GSV | L75–83 | -2.5 | +0.7 |
| Jul 5 | vs DAL | L76–89 | -6.3 | -6.6 |
| Jun 27 | vs PHX | L80–89 | -3.0 | +7.2 |
| Jun 25 |  vs LA | W125–97 | +2.8 | +15.0 |
| Jun 22 | @ ATL | L87–94 | -19.4 | +0.2 |
| Jun 19 | @ CONN | W101–97 | +0.0 | +11.8 |
| Jun 16 | @ IND | L91–113 | +2.2 | +1.5 |
| Jun 14 | vs ATL | L77–102 | -21.4 | -2.8 |
| Jun 12 | @ WAS | L85–86 | -6.4 | +6.3 |
| Jun 10 | vs CONN | W106–102 | -1.3 | -0.8 |
| Jun 7 | vs CHI | W85–68 | +13.0 | -15.8 |
| Jun 3 | @ NY | L82–97 | -3.2 | +3.8 |
| May 30 | vs SEA | W93–72 | -9.3 | -0.8 |
| May 27 | @ CHI | W111–104 | -10.7 | +17.6 |
| May 23 | vs POR | L80–99 | -7.7 | -1.5 |
| May 21 | @ MIN | L72–100 | +1.7 | -15.9 |
| May 19 | @ PHX | W98–90 | +3.5 | +7.0 |
| May 17 | @ LA | W106–96 | -6.5 | +3.6 |
| May 15 | @ LA | L95–99 | +11.2 | -0.4 |
| May 13 | vs SEA | W86–73 | +12.5 | +1.6 |
| May 8 | vs WAS | L65–68 | -2.3 | -27.0 |
| May 1 | @ MIN | L66–73 | +12.2 | -14.5 |