This game · 130 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Toronto Tempo won on finishing, not shot quality.

led the way with 14 points on 5-for-8 (63%), headlined by 3-for-3 from the corner — 4.8 more than expected overall with 63% of attempts from the rim or corner.
- Seattle Storm created 9.3 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Both teams finished below expectation — Toronto Tempo held up better (0.8 pts below expected).
- Q2 swung the look battle — Seattle Storm built a +7.2 expected-point edge in that period.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Toronto Tempo (47% good looks) and Seattle Storm (41% good looks) ran comparable diets with small zone-by-zone differences.

found the right spots — 3 attempts from the corner — but couldn't convert, going 1/3.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 27% of Seattle's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 32% of Toronto's; Toronto tilted here more (32% vs 27%).

This is where the shot diets diverged most — 27% of Seattle's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 32% of Toronto's; Toronto tilted here more (32% vs 27%).
Possession context

TOR ran more early offense in this game.
Toronto Tempo got 39% of FGA in transition (1.00 expected pts/att) vs 17% for Seattle Storm (1.07 expected pts/att).
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard

Full process edge
Toronto Tempo won by 34.9 pts — SQ edge said SEA.
Seattle Storm got the better looks, but Toronto Tempo won the full process battle by 34.9 pts.
Process edge blends expected points from shots, finishing, free throws, turnover cost, and second-chance value — not just who found the better offense.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightMabrey's strongest zone was Rim — 100% from Rim (2/2) vs. a 60% expectation.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →






