This game · 147 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Atlanta Dream won by getting the better shots.

led the way with 19 points on 8-for-13 (62%), headlined by 2-for-2 from above the break — 3.9 more than expected overall with 62% of attempts from the rim or corner, with Te-Hina Paopao close behind (+3.8 on 9 points).
- Atlanta Dream created 11.6 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Atlanta Dream outperformed expected value by 9.0 points on finishing.
- Q3 swung the look battle — Atlanta Dream built a +9.3 expected-point edge in that period.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Atlanta Dream attacked the rim more — 43% of attempts in the restricted area vs 34% for Indiana Fever.

carried the offense at the rim — 7/9 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 34% of Indiana's attempts came from the rim vs 43% of Atlanta's, with Atlanta leaning on the higher-value zone (43% vs 34%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 34% of Indiana's attempts came from the rim vs 43% of Atlanta's, with Atlanta leaning on the higher-value zone (43% vs 34%).
Possession context
ATL ran more early offense in this game.
Atlanta Dream got 38% of FGA in transition (1.06 expected pts/att) vs 22% for Indiana Fever (1.04 expected pts/att).
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Atlanta Dream won by 28.4 pts
Atlanta Dream won the turnover battle by 10 (19 total TO).
Turnovers never enter the shot log — a clean process win even when looks were even.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightGray's strongest zone was Rim — 86% from Rim (6/7) vs. a 58% expectation.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →






