This game · 152 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Minnesota Lynx won on finishing, not shot quality.

led the way with 24 points on 9-for-14 (64%), headlined by 5-for-6 at the rim — 6.2 more than expected overall with 71% of attempts from the rim or corner.
- Portland Fire created 2.3 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Minnesota Lynx outperformed expected value by 9.2 points on finishing.
- The game flipped in the fourth quarter — Portland Fire created a +3.5 expected-point edge in Q4.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Minnesota Lynx (56% good looks) and Portland Fire (55% good looks) ran comparable diets with small zone-by-zone differences.

carried the offense at the rim — 7/7 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 38% of Portland's attempts came from the rim vs 44% of Minnesota's, with Minnesota leaning on the higher-value zone (44% vs 38%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 38% of Portland's attempts came from the rim vs 44% of Minnesota's, with Minnesota leaning on the higher-value zone (44% vs 38%).
Possession context
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Minnesota Lynx won by 12.0 pts — SQ edge said POR.
Portland Fire got the better looks, but Minnesota Lynx won the full process battle by 12.0 pts.
Process edge blends expected points from shots, finishing, free throws, turnover cost, and second-chance value — not just who found the better offense.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightMiles found the right spots (50% from the rim or corner) but couldn't finish — -3.2 below expected on those looks.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →




