This game · 144 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Phoenix Mercury won by getting the better shots.

led the way with 21 points on 10-for-16 (63%), headlined by 8-for-9 at the rim — 4.3 more than expected overall with 63% of attempts from the rim or corner.
- Phoenix Mercury created 2.6 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Phoenix Mercury outperformed expected value by 2.0 points on makes and misses.
- Q3 swung the look battle — Phoenix Mercury built a +9.3 expected-point edge in that period.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Los Angeles Sparks (33% good looks) and Phoenix Mercury (37% good looks) ran comparable diets with small zone-by-zone differences.

carried the offense at the rim — 8/9 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 31% of Phoenix's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 36% of Los Angeles's; Los Angeles tilted here more (36% vs 31%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 31% of Phoenix's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 36% of Los Angeles's; Los Angeles tilted here more (36% vs 31%).
Possession context
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Phoenix Mercury won by 6.9 pts
Phoenix Mercury got the better looks, but Los Angeles Sparks carried the process scorecard.
Los Angeles Sparks won the free-throw line by 8 pts and the turnover battle by 6. Those stops never show up in expected pts per attempt.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightBurrell's strongest zone was Cor 3 — 100% from Cor 3 (1/1) vs. a 44% expectation.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →






