This game · 149 FGA|Season model · 357 games · 48,742 shots
Chicago Sky won — the process matched the result.
led the way with 18 points on 8-for-10 (80%), headlined by 5-for-5 in the interior — 7.3 more than expected overall with 50% of attempts from the rim or corner.
- Chicago Sky created 1.3 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Chicago Sky outperformed expected value by 11.1 points on makes and misses.
- Q3 swung the look battle — Chicago Sky built a +7.4 expected-point edge in that period.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Toronto Tempo lived in the midrange (20%) while Chicago Sky was at 9% — a cleaner profile for Chicago Sky.
carried the offense at the rim — 8/10 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 26% of Toronto's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 32% of Chicago's; Chicago tilted here more (32% vs 26%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 26% of Toronto's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 32% of Chicago's; Chicago tilted here more (32% vs 26%).
Possession context
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Chicago Sky won by 12.7 pts
Chicago Sky won the turnover battle by 6 (18 total TO).
Turnovers never enter the shot log — a clean process win even when looks were even.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightTaylor's strongest zone was Cor 3 — 100% from Cor 3 (1/1) vs. a 44% expectation.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →