This game · 137 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Dallas Wings won — the process matched the result.

led the way with 25 points on 10-for-18 (56%), headlined by 2-for-2 from long midrange — 5.3 more than expected overall on a night most other looks were tougher.
- Dallas Wings created 0.9 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Dallas Wings outperformed expected value by 4.9 points on finishing.
- Q2 swung the look battle — Los Angeles Sparks built a +4.8 expected-point edge in that period.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Dallas Wings lived in the midrange (30%) while Los Angeles Sparks was at 16% — a cleaner profile for Los Angeles Sparks.

carried the offense at the rim — 6/6 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 29% of Los Angeles's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 22% of Dallas's; Los Angeles tilted here more (29% vs 22%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 29% of Los Angeles's attempts came from above-arc threes vs 22% of Dallas's; Los Angeles tilted here more (29% vs 22%).
Possession context
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Dallas Wings won by 8.2 pts
Dallas Wings won 2 of 3 process categories outside the shot log.
Free throws, turnovers, and offensive rebounds come from ESPN box scores — complementary to FGA-only shot quality above.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightBueckers created in difficult areas and delivered — 100% from L.Mid (2/2) well above the 40% baseline for that zone.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →




