This game · 133 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Atlanta Dream won by getting the better shots.

led the way with 20 points on 9-for-9 (100%), headlined by 7-for-7 at the rim — 9.7 more than expected overall with 78% of attempts from the rim or corner.
- Atlanta Dream created 13.0 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Atlanta Dream outperformed expected value by 31.7 points on finishing.
- The game flipped in the fourth quarter — Atlanta Dream created a +6.9 expected-point edge in Q4.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Atlanta Dream attacked the rim more — 40% of attempts in the restricted area vs 31% for Los Angeles Sparks.

carried the offense at the rim — 7/7 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 40% of Atlanta's attempts came from the rim vs 31% of Los Angeles's, with Atlanta leaning on the higher-value zone (40% vs 31%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 40% of Atlanta's attempts came from the rim vs 31% of Los Angeles's, with Atlanta leaning on the higher-value zone (40% vs 31%).
Possession context
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Atlanta Dream won by 54.1 pts
Atlanta Dream won the turnover battle by 7 (21 total TO).
Turnovers never enter the shot log — a clean process win even when looks were even.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightOgwumike lived in the midrange — 60% of attempts from tough spots, dragging shot quality down.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →





