This game · 135 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Connecticut Sun won by getting the better shots.

led the way with 17 points on 7-for-12 (58%), headlined by 3-for-4 from above the break — 5.1 more than expected overall on a night most other looks were tougher.
- Connecticut Sun created 6.6 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Connecticut Sun outperformed expected value by 6.2 points on makes and misses.
- Q3 swung the look battle — Connecticut Sun built a +5.9 expected-point edge in that period.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Connecticut Sun lived in the midrange (23%) while Los Angeles Sparks was at 13% — a cleaner profile for Los Angeles Sparks.

bailed out the offense from the midrange — 4/5 from long midrange, a zone most players avoid for good reason.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 33% of Los Angeles's attempts came from the rim vs 41% of Connecticut's, with Connecticut leaning on the higher-value zone (41% vs 33%).
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 33% of Los Angeles's attempts came from the rim vs 41% of Connecticut's, with Connecticut leaning on the higher-value zone (41% vs 33%).
Possession context
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard
Full process edge
Connecticut Sun won by 8.0 pts
Connecticut Sun got the better looks, but Los Angeles Sparks carried the process scorecard.
Los Angeles Sparks won the free-throw line by 8 pts. Those stops never show up in expected pts per attempt.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightRivers's strongest zone was S.Mid — 50% from S.Mid (1/2) vs. a 39% expectation.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →


