This game · 144 FGA|Season model · 290 games · 39,575 shots
Indiana Fever won on finishing, not shot quality.

led the way with 24 points on 8-for-11 (73%), headlined by 6-for-7 from above the break — 10.0 more than expected overall.
- Toronto Tempo created 2.2 more expected points from field-goal attempts.
- Indiana Fever outperformed expected value by 9.6 points on finishing.
- Toronto Tempo's edge came from rim pressure — 36% of attempts at the restricted area.
Shot quality
Shot diet
Indiana Fever got the cleaner diet — 54% rim or corner looks vs 43% for Toronto Tempo.

carried the offense at the rim — 5/6 in the restricted area.
This is where the shot diets diverged most — 36% of Toronto's attempts came from the rim vs 48% of Indiana's, with Indiana leaning on the higher-value zone (48% vs 36%).

This is where the shot diets diverged most — 36% of Toronto's attempts came from the rim vs 48% of Indiana's, with Indiana leaning on the higher-value zone (48% vs 36%).
Possession context

IND ran more early offense in this game.
Indiana Fever got 36% of FGA in transition (1.06 expected pts/att) vs 23% for Toronto Tempo (1.05 expected pts/att).
Inferred from ESPN play-by-play — transition, steals, and offensive rebounds before each FGA. Not official possession tracking.
Process scorecard

Full process edge
Indiana Fever won by 30.2 pts — SQ edge said TOR.
Toronto Tempo got the better looks, but Indiana Fever won the full process battle by 30.2 pts.
Process edge blends expected points from shots, finishing, free throws, turnover cost, and second-chance value — not just who found the better offense.
Tracked FGA
ESPN box score
Process value (pts)
Process total = expected pts from shots + finishing + free throws − turnover cost + second-chance value (1.05 expected pts per OReb). SQ edge alone ignores the last three terms.
Player shots
Key insightClark struggled most from Above — 1/8 against a 31% baseline.
Expected value is an estimate from public shot data — location, shooter history, and shot clock. No defender distance, closeout speed, spacing, or proprietary tracking.
Learn how it works →






